<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fahrenheit 9/11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephen.evilcoder.com/archives/2004/07/04/fahrenheit-911/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephen.evilcoder.com/archives/2004/07/04/fahrenheit-911</link>
	<description>The Rants of a UC Berkeley Student</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://stephen.evilcoder.com/archives/2004/07/04/fahrenheit-911#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephen.evilcoder.com/archives/2004/07/04/fahrenheit-911#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Alas, another hardcore Kerry supporter. What's weird about my stance on gay marriage and my desire to vote for Bush? I don't believe in giving rights to gay couples, and I certainly don't believe in gay marriage. Bush agrees with me; I can't say the same about Kerry.

I might not perfectly agree with the administration's policy towards Homeland Security, but it appears that the Democrats would have done the same thing. Just check Kerry's debate responses.

What makes Kerry a horrible choice for President? Let's see:
a) He wavers in his decisions and doesn't seem to have a cohorent policy on many issues. At one point he's for the war in Iraq, and at the other, he's against it. Likewise with funding for troops. He says he's for nuclear power, but he refuses to support any method for disposing the inevitable nuclear waste.
b) He tries to cater to the Christians, but many of his policies seem to lack moral guidance. He says he's against gay "marriage" but would still extend the same rights to gay couples. I see no difference.
c) He has no major policy tied with his name. If anything, he's been a wallflower in Congress.

Anyways, your heated reply only makes me think that you're a lifeless troll who googles for Republican blogs only to post some cookie cutter attack message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, another hardcore Kerry supporter. What&#8217;s weird about my stance on gay marriage and my desire to vote for Bush? I don&#8217;t believe in giving rights to gay couples, and I certainly don&#8217;t believe in gay marriage. Bush agrees with me; I can&#8217;t say the same about Kerry.</p>
<p>I might not perfectly agree with the administration&#8217;s policy towards Homeland Security, but it appears that the Democrats would have done the same thing. Just check Kerry&#8217;s debate responses.</p>
<p>What makes Kerry a horrible choice for President? Let&#8217;s see:<br />
a) He wavers in his decisions and doesn&#8217;t seem to have a cohorent policy on many issues. At one point he&#8217;s for the war in Iraq, and at the other, he&#8217;s against it. Likewise with funding for troops. He says he&#8217;s for nuclear power, but he refuses to support any method for disposing the inevitable nuclear waste.<br />
b) He tries to cater to the Christians, but many of his policies seem to lack moral guidance. He says he&#8217;s against gay &#8220;marriage&#8221; but would still extend the same rights to gay couples. I see no difference.<br />
c) He has no major policy tied with his name. If anything, he&#8217;s been a wallflower in Congress.</p>
<p>Anyways, your heated reply only makes me think that you&#8217;re a lifeless troll who googles for Republican blogs only to post some cookie cutter attack message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timmay</title>
		<link>http://stephen.evilcoder.com/archives/2004/07/04/fahrenheit-911#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>timmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephen.evilcoder.com/archives/2004/07/04/fahrenheit-911#comment-37</guid>
		<description>It's weird hearing that you're voting for Bush when you complain about the direction of Gay Marriage and Liberty vs. Safety. I wonder what Bush administration actions you support? I can't think of any that don't screw over the majority of the country for the benefit or the few. I would suggest reading Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, by Al Franken, before the election. Unlike folks like O'Riely, Limbaugh, et. all, Franken gives references to his facts, rather than just make up shit.

Also, what makes Kerry a "horrible choice for president"? I've heard a number of people who say they're voting for Bush because "something just doesn't seem right about Kerry". That drives me nuts. Is all the bullshit really working? Are a draft-doger and an AWOL criminal *actually* turning the nation against a medal-winning Vietnam veteran?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s weird hearing that you&#8217;re voting for Bush when you complain about the direction of Gay Marriage and Liberty vs. Safety. I wonder what Bush administration actions you support? I can&#8217;t think of any that don&#8217;t screw over the majority of the country for the benefit or the few. I would suggest reading Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, by Al Franken, before the election. Unlike folks like O&#8217;Riely, Limbaugh, et. all, Franken gives references to his facts, rather than just make up shit.</p>
<p>Also, what makes Kerry a &#8220;horrible choice for president&#8221;? I&#8217;ve heard a number of people who say they&#8217;re voting for Bush because &#8220;something just doesn&#8217;t seem right about Kerry&#8221;. That drives me nuts. Is all the bullshit really working? Are a draft-doger and an AWOL criminal *actually* turning the nation against a medal-winning Vietnam veteran?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
